If his pension is computed under the terms of the additional Pension minute
inter colonial of 25 April 1870 the total pension scheme of 1869
Amended
only by a draft Minute not yet approved, the amount will be as under
Main thus service 31 years.
Salary at date £1500
Hong Kong service 8 years
£1380
£1500
Pension 39ths of £4500
Coverage & last
Lea rule & framncíaní A]
Crander
Salary at date £1500
Exlwoment
£897 of
or £465 would be
which is 31st of £900 contributed by Mlavorticis
On the other hand if his pension be computed under the less favourable term of the inter-colonial scheme of 1870 as embodied in the Draft Minute of 1880 bis
the amount would be as under
For his 23 years Mauritius service £900 £465 For his 8 years Hong Kong.
(Stearnedded bow previous charines
homial rules Csopa
134 £150=325
Fotal £790
The difference between the inter colonial Pension schemes of 1869 1870. it will be observed, is that the former treated service in two distinct Colonies as continuous for pension purposes, while under the latter
two separate pensions are
are accorded based on the separate salaries received in each Colony.
I myself think that Elliyoshi's pension should be treated in the more
favourable basis of the scheme of 1869 for the reason that it was not till a year after Mann and had taken his duties in Hong Kong
MINUTE PAPER.
374
up
that an intimation
was received in the Colony from the Secretary of State that the Inter-colonial Pension
as embodied in the same scheme of 1869 had not been activated. Pension Minute of 25 April 1870 & subsequent in the draft Minute of 5 September 1880) had not been adopted. I do not think the warning referred to by bchucas (in the printed précis in 11445 which should be read in considering this case) ought properly
to be taken as
abrogation of the scheme for
as it only said that some alterations
in this scheme are contemplated
and that the minute now being dealt with may consequently require revision at some future time"
ills Round in his Minute on 11445/4bliot expressed the opinion that "it is possible that
some officer may have been transferred
and 1880 to Chorhiveen to that Colony
1870
when nothing special was said as to their pensions, and who have been misled by the fact that the minute embodying
the rules of 1869
allowed to remain
"in operation there long after it was decided here to supersede them by the rule
If his pension is comfented under the terms of the additional Sension minute
inter colonial of 25 april 187 the tonal pension scheme f-1869
Amended
only by a draft Minute not yet appooed, the amount will be as under
a
Main tuus service 31 years.
Salary at clatio Agoo
yei
Hong Kong service & year
1380
£1500
Pension 39ths of E4500tioner,
Coverage & last
Lea rule & framncíaní A]
Crander
Salam at dato 21500
Exlwoment
€897 of
or £465 would be
which 31 the of £900 contributed by Mlavorticis
On the other hand if his pension be computed under the lass favourable term of the inter-colonial scheme of 1870 as embodied in the Draft Minute op 1580 bis
the amount would be an under
Go
For his years Mauritius service bythes bk900 £465 For his & years thongkong. (Stearnedded bow previous charines
homial rules Csopa
134 £150=325
Fotal £ 790
The difference between the inter colomal Cension schemes of 1869 1870. it will be observed, is that the former treated service in two distinct Colonics as continuous for pension purposes, while under the latter
two scharate frensions are
are acorched ba on the separate calories received in each ! Colony.
I myself thamik that ellyellowshi's pension should be treated in the more
favorable basis of the selame & 1869 for the reason that it was not tillatter ང་ར་མ་འམལ་
MINUTE PAPER.
374
up
year after Man and had taken his duties in Hong Kong
that an intimation
was received in the Colony from the Secretary of State that the Inter-colonial Pension
Cas embydied in the Sample scheme of 1869 had not been activites Pension Minule of 25 april 1870 & subegamble in the draft Minute of 5 September 1676) had not been adopted. I do not thimik the warningthebarreed to by bchucas (in the printed précis in 11445 which should be read in considering this case) ought properly
abrogation of the scheme fogg
to be taken as
Am
"
as it only said that some altivations
in this scheme are contemplated
and that the minute now being dealt with may consequently require revision at some future time"
ills Round in his Minute on 11445/4bliot expressed the ofimien that "it is posible that
some officer may have been transferred
and 1880 to Chorhiveen to that Colony
1870
when nothing special was said as tether fensions, and who have been misled by the fact that the minute embody inf
the rules of 1869
allowed to remain
"in offeration there long after it was I decided here to supersede them by the rule
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.